Popular 1900s names, and how old they are now
Babies born in the 1900s are 117 to 126 years old in 2026. Social Security recorded about 4.3 million of them under names it lists, and by our estimate 0% are still alive: about 0 people.
The decade's top names were Mary for girls and John for boys. Of the top ten for each, 14 still go to at least 1,000 babies a year.
Top 1900s girl names
| # | Name | Born 1900s | Alive today | Avg. age, everyone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mary | 161,504 | under 100 | 66 |
| 2 | Helen | 69,428 | under 100 | 66 |
| 3 | Margaret | 57,919 | under 100 | 61 |
| 4 | Anna | 54,918 | under 100 | 39 |
| 5 | Ruth | 51,010 | under 100 | 62 |
| 6 | Elizabeth | 41,708 | under 100 | 44 |
| 7 | Dorothy | 39,112 | under 100 | 72 |
| 8 | Marie | 37,091 | under 100 | 62 |
| 9 | Florence | 36,191 | under 100 | 66 |
| 10 | Mildred | 36,173 | under 100 | 74 |
| 11 | Alice | 35,232 | under 100 | 53 |
| 12 | Ethel | 34,868 | under 100 | 76 |
| 13 | Lillian | 32,519 | under 100 | 29 |
| 14 | Gladys | 30,285 | under 100 | 68 |
| 15 | Edna | 29,832 | under 100 | 70 |
| 16 | Frances | 28,499 | under 100 | 67 |
| 17 | Rose | 28,106 | under 100 | 56 |
| 18 | Annie | 27,748 | under 100 | 54 |
| 19 | Grace | 26,927 | under 100 | 27 |
| 20 | Bertha | 24,247 | under 100 | 69 |
| 21 | Emma | 24,176 | under 100 | 20 |
| 22 | Bessie | 23,984 | under 100 | 74 |
| 23 | Clara | 23,899 | under 100 | 36 |
| 24 | Hazel | 23,802 | under 100 | 27 |
| 25 | Irene | 23,656 | under 100 | 61 |
| 26 | Gertrude | 23,607 | under 100 | 76 |
| 27 | Louise | 22,862 | under 100 | 69 |
| 28 | Catherine | 22,006 | under 100 | 54 |
| 29 | Martha | 21,750 | under 100 | 66 |
| 30 | Mabel | 21,625 | under 100 | 34 |
| 31 | Pearl | 20,913 | under 100 | 51 |
| 32 | Edith | 20,884 | under 100 | 57 |
| 33 | Esther | 20,026 | under 100 | 42 |
| 34 | Minnie | 19,715 | under 100 | 72 |
| 35 | Myrtle | 19,691 | under 100 | 79 |
| 36 | Ida | 18,866 | under 100 | 65 |
| 37 | Josephine | 18,785 | under 100 | 39 |
| 38 | Evelyn | 18,603 | under 100 | 34 |
| 39 | Elsie | 18,452 | under 100 | 41 |
| 40 | Eva | 18,357 | under 100 | 36 |
| 41 | Thelma | 18,265 | under 100 | 74 |
| 42 | Ruby | 18,175 | under 100 | 39 |
| 43 | Agnes | 17,616 | under 100 | 64 |
| 44 | Sarah | 17,342 | under 100 | 39 |
| 45 | Viola | 16,559 | under 100 | 61 |
| 46 | Nellie | 16,339 | under 100 | 58 |
| 47 | Beatrice | 16,282 | under 100 | 56 |
| 48 | Julia | 16,107 | under 100 | 38 |
| 49 | Laura | 15,532 | under 100 | 51 |
| 50 | Lillie | 15,391 | under 100 | 54 |
Top 1900s boy names
| # | Name | Born 1900s | Alive today | Avg. age, everyone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John | 84,590 | under 100 | 55 |
| 2 | William | 69,320 | under 100 | 51 |
| 3 | James | 62,170 | under 100 | 54 |
| 4 | George | 43,589 | under 100 | 57 |
| 5 | Charles | 36,184 | under 100 | 54 |
| 6 | Robert | 35,849 | under 100 | 58 |
| 7 | Joseph | 35,173 | under 100 | 45 |
| 8 | Frank | 29,046 | under 100 | 59 |
| 9 | Edward | 24,516 | under 100 | 56 |
| 10 | Thomas | 21,783 | under 100 | 53 |
| 11 | Henry | 21,772 | under 100 | 34 |
| 12 | Walter | 19,997 | under 100 | 58 |
| 13 | Harry | 17,906 | under 100 | 62 |
| 14 | Willie | 17,746 | under 100 | 64 |
| 15 | Arthur | 15,409 | under 100 | 54 |
| 16 | Albert | 15,318 | under 100 | 57 |
| 17 | Clarence | 13,573 | under 100 | 62 |
| 18 | Fred | 13,076 | under 100 | 67 |
| 19 | Harold | 12,795 | under 100 | 66 |
| 20 | Paul | 12,636 | under 100 | 57 |
| 21 | Raymond | 11,650 | under 100 | 56 |
| 22 | Richard | 10,675 | under 100 | 60 |
| 23 | Roy | 10,632 | under 100 | 60 |
| 24 | Joe | 10,466 | under 100 | 61 |
| 25 | Louis | 10,372 | under 100 | 52 |
| 26 | Carl | 9,865 | under 100 | 60 |
| 27 | Ralph | 9,298 | under 100 | 65 |
| 28 | Earl | 9,251 | under 100 | 64 |
| 29 | Jack | 9,222 | under 100 | 34 |
| 30 | Ernest | 8,657 | under 100 | 61 |
| 31 | David | 8,619 | under 100 | 52 |
| 32 | Samuel | 8,149 | under 100 | 32 |
| 33 | Howard | 8,014 | under 100 | 65 |
| 34 | Charlie | 7,928 | under 100 | 31 |
| 35 | Francis | 7,021 | under 100 | 57 |
| 36 | Herbert | 6,957 | under 100 | 65 |
| 37 | Lawrence | 6,846 | under 100 | 60 |
| 38 | Theodore | 6,490 | under 100 | 29 |
| 39 | Alfred | 6,356 | under 100 | 60 |
| 40 | Andrew | 6,277 | under 100 | 36 |
| 41 | Sam | 6,161 | under 100 | 47 |
| 42 | Elmer | 6,161 | under 100 | 56 |
| 43 | Eugene | 5,909 | under 100 | 63 |
| 44 | Leo | 5,629 | under 100 | 24 |
| 45 | Michael | 5,220 | under 100 | 49 |
| 46 | Lee | 5,158 | under 100 | 57 |
| 47 | Herman | 5,064 | under 100 | 63 |
| 48 | Anthony | 5,043 | under 100 | 40 |
| 49 | Daniel | 5,036 | under 100 | 42 |
| 50 | Leonard | 5,022 | under 100 | 60 |
About these numbers
“Born” counts the babies of each sex given the name in the 1900s, from Social Security's records. “Alive today” estimates how many of those babies are still living, using SSA's cohort life tables. “Avg. age, everyone” is the average age of everyone alive with the name, not just the 1900s babies. Records before the late 1930s undercount births, because many people born then never applied for a Social Security card. How we calculate this